Democrats have worked to make it legally impossible for Trump to run for reelection. According to one expert, they may go so far as to imprison him before he has an opportunity to defend himself.
Trump commented on the situation once more today.
A little over a week ago, an article was published online that explains why former President Trump is being prosecuted on federal charges brought by Joe Biden’s government, as well as the reasoning behind the allegations.
“In an announcement on Truth Social on Tuesday, former President Donald Trump revealed that he had been informed he is the subject of an investigation conducted by a grand jury based in Washington. The investigation is centered around the Jan. 6 Capitol incursion and Trump’s role in the events of the day,” according to a Wednesday article by Rachel Emmanuel for The Western Journal.
“The timing of this investigation is not a coincidence. It has been two years since the tumult, and over 1,000 have faced various charges, according to Axios, but not Trump. So why now?” she said, continuing that she thought “the actual motive” for charging Trump now was to use the law to bar him from ever holding the White House — or any elected position — again.
According to Emmanuel, Section 3 of the 14th Amendment will be utilized in “a desperate campaign strategy to keep the former Trump off the ballot in the 2024 election.”
According to investigative journalist Julie Kelly, Special Counsel Jack Smith “very well could ask a D.C. judge to deny Donald Trump’s release, to deny him bail once he is indicted, arrested, and arraigned” on charges related to the incident at the Capitol on January 6, 2021.
Sunday evening, Kelly discussed the impending indictment of former President Trump with Breitbart News host Joel B. Pollak.
Sunday night, Kelly posted on her Substack that Trump would soon face the same punishment as the January 6 defendants, who were held in pretrial detention for months despite being charged with nonviolent felonies.
Kelly stated on air that it was likely that the prosecution would charge Trump and that he would likely be found guilty due to the prejudicial thinking of the D.C. jury pool, despite the Department of Justice’s obvious hypocrisy in choosing not to handle Black Lives Matter rioters in 2020 similarly or enforcing the same law to socialist activists at the Supreme Court or outside the domiciles of specific justices.
The exhaustive and biased January 6 sham Committee and a congressional impeachment investigation both investigated Trump’s actions on January 6, when he instructed protesters to march “peacefully and patriotically” to the Capitol, but no evidence of malfeasance was found. In an effort to defeat him, Smith appears to be testing novel hypotheses, such as the so-called “fake elector” theory.
“The Trump campaign — like John F. Kennedy’s 1960 campaign — prepared alternate slates of electors to reserve the right to have their votes counted in the event that recounts or court cases overturned the results of close elections in battleground states. The Special Counsel’s office is thought to be construing that strategy as an unlawful conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election results,” Pollack wrote for Breitbart.
Pollak asked Kelly if Smith could attempt to prevent Trump from running for president in 2020 by prosecuting him with sedition, which some Democrats have argued would be grounds for barring Trump from holding public office under the Fourteenth Amendment.
She concurred that he may, saying, “I think it is a strong possibility that they will charge him with seditious conspiracy,” stressing that prosecutors had primarily relied on Trump’s words in accusing and convicting Proud Boys activists previously in the year.
More on this story via The Republic Brief:
Hunter Biden received special treatment from the Department of Justice, seemingly with the intention of shielding his father, Joe Biden, Kelly added, and this was only achievable provided the prosecution had “the full support of the corporate media.” CONTINUE READING…
