Trump’s Supreme Court is nearly preferable to his presidency. Not exactly the same, but they are hurling wrecking balls at the libertarians.
In the wake of Roe vs. Wade being overruled by the Supreme Court, liberals became apoplectic, rioting around the country. Violence erupted in certain regions, where, oddly, abortion is still legal. Saving newborns to the left is awful. They want no responsibility for individual actions.
In reversing Roe, Justice Clarence Thomas argued in a concurring opinion that the Supreme Court should reexamine certain precedents that have political repercussions.
He urged reexamining contraception and homosexual marriage judgments by the Supreme Court.
Imagine if those decisions were modified. Liberal heads would supernova.
Today, SCOTUS handed a victory for freedom while at the same time destroying angry Biden’s socialist agenda.
The Daily Mail reported:
The Supreme Court found in a 6 to 3 decision to curtail the federal government’s powers to regulate emissions from power plants.
The case declares it unlawful for federal agencies to make ‘major’ decisions without clear authorization from Congress. It appears to allow for regulations focused narrowly on capping pollution from smokestacks, but blocks wider rules that set state-by-state targets for emissions reduction or a cap-and-trade system that would trigger a faster shift to clean energy.
Capping carbon dioxide emissions at a level that will force a nationwide transition away from the use of coal to generate electricity may be a sensible ‘solution to the crisis of the day,’ Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in his opinion for the court.
But he added that the Clean Air Act does not give the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the authority to do so.
‘A decision of such magnitude and consequence rests with Congress itself, or an agency acting pursuant to a clear delegation from that representative body,’ he wrote.
The court’s liberals, Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan dissented.
More on this story via The Republic Brief:
‘Today, the court strips the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of the power Congress Instead of deciding on an existing rule, the Supreme Court set a precedent for Biden’s future rule, which was expected to fall in line with his goal for the entire U.S. power grid to run on clean energy by 2035.
‘It’s a bad decision and an unnecessary one, but the EPA can still limit greenhouse gases at the source under Section 111 and more broadly through other Clean Air Act provisions. In the wake of this ruling, EPA must use its remaining authority to the fullest,’ said Jason Rylander, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity’s Climate Law Institute, in a statement. CONTINUE READING…