Amy Coney Barrett, a conservative Supreme Court justice, was singled out for comprehending the “real issue” in the historic “LGBT wedding cake” case that is currently before the court. Sonia Sotomayor, a radical Marxist justice, on the other hand, publicly declared that she was ignorant of the fundamentals of the US Constitution, particularly how the country’s constitution views religious liberties.

To understand what is amiss with the radical left and also why they shouldn’t be in power to safeguard the U.S. Constitution, it is important to examine the differences between the two ladies.

Arguments in the case were heard by the US Supreme Court on Monday.

“For nearly a decade, the justices have dodged and weaved on this clash of legal values, declining to hear some cases and punting on one involving a baker who refused to make custom wedding cakes for same-sex couples. But now the issue is back before a far more conservative court, a court that reached out to hear Monday’s case even before any same-sex couples complained that they were the victims of illegal discrimination,” according to NPR.

Lorie Smith, a business owner from Colorado who has been designing websites for clients for the past ten years, is the plaintiff in the lawsuit.

According to Kaelan Deese of the Washington Examiner, “The lead attorney who represented Colorado web designer Lorie Smith before the Supreme Court this week said she believed Justice Amy Coney Barrett “identified the real issue” in her client’s fight to refuse working on same-sex wedding websites, which violates her sincere religious beliefs.”

Web and graphics designer Smith, who is based in Littleton, was represented by Alliance Defending Freedom CEO and attorney Kristen Waggoner. According to Waggoner, Smith suffered a six-year “constitutional injury” as a result of Colorado’s Anti-Discrimination Act because it would force her to produce messages for customers whose lifestyles conflict with her religious beliefs.

Waggoner noted that Smith “serves everyone” and had previously worked on projects for LGBT clients. “In terms of Justice Barrett’s question, I thought that it identified the real issue here, which, again, is about what the message is and not who the person is,” Waggoner said.

More on this story via The Republic Brief:

Lawyer Kristen Waggoner of the Alliance Defending Freedom, center, accompanied by her client, Lorie Smith, a Christian graphic artist and website designer in Colorado, right in pink coat, speaks outside the Supreme Court in Washington, Monday, Dec. 5, 2022, after arguing before the Court. The Supreme Court is hearing the case of Smith who objects to designing wedding websites for gay couples, that’s the latest clash of religion and gay rights to land at the highest court.

Deese continued:

During oral arguments over the case on Dec. 5, Barrett echoed Waggoner’s point that Smith’s dispute is “about the message” after she posed a hypothetical scenario on whether she would design a website for a heterosexual couple getting married after divorcing other people. CONTINUE READING…