The Supreme Court of the United States just “pulled the bandage” off the Marxist left! After last week’s two major decisions regarding gun control and abortion, the Supreme Court may be about to punch another hole in the massive insurrection against our American Republic.
The Boston Herald reported on Sunday that “The U.S. Supreme Court isn’t done with big cases for the year — decisions on school prayer and environmental rules, among others, still loom”.
They were correct: “Supreme Court rules for former coach in public school prayer case Former Coach Joseph Kennedy argued that the Bremerton School District violated his religious freedom by telling him he couldn’t pray on the field after games.”
This session’s topic is whether a football coach had the right to pray, and if the Supreme Court rules that he did, the left will undoubtedly become even more agitated.
The left is upset that the court is relying on history rather than the feelings of the woke mob to guide its decisions. In this way, a Constitutional Republican differs from a democracy. And they may be about to receive another hit with School Prayer by the Supremes.
The left persuasively explains why they insist we are a democracy and why we must maintain our republic, with our representatives serving us, as opposed to a monarchy of elites who worship their own feelings. Because when they serve the mob, we receive nothing.
GQ, a men’s grooming magazine, is concerned that the Supreme Court of the United States is taking America backward with two major rulings from last week. See how Cristian Farias described it:
“More Guns, Less Freedom: The Supreme Court Wants to Take America Back to the 18th Century. The contradictions between two seismic rulings on gun rights and abortion this week reveal a brutal approach to the law.”
“Over the course of two days this week, the Supreme Court of the United States redefined American society, and people’s power to shape it, by looking at what the Constitution says or doesn’t say about two freedoms: that of women to decide the course of their own lives, and that of those who wish take up arms in self-defense.
More on this story via The Republic Brief:
They did it because they could. These freedoms, like others enshrined in law, have long carried certain limits and responsibilities. Yet for the high court’s ultraconservative majority, only one must yield to majority rule — the will of voters and elected representatives in the various states — and the other must be guarded zealously from this tyranny.
In overruling Roe v. Wade, and with it nearly 50 years of American law, and expanding the reach of the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, which is a jurisprudential innovation of more recent vintage, the Supreme Court wants the public to accept that history rules the present — and that our founding charter, which is hailed as a beacon of liberty pointing to a more perfect union, reflects rules set in stone that no judge should dare disturb.” CONTINUE READING…