In early May, Chief Justice John Roberts confirmed the veracity of a leaked draft judgment published by Politico, betraying the US Supreme Court and sparking a summer of wrath against the Supreme Court, the Pro-life movement, and Conservatives.
At the time, Robers stated that the controversial draft that appeared to overturn Roe v. Wade did not represent the court’s final stance, implying that everyone involved was pressuring the Justices to modify their opinions prior to releasing the judgment to the public.
Since early May, the left’s entire protest business has been harassing the Judges for obeying the left, resulting in death threats to conservative justices and an arrest for murder threats against Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
While many feel they know who leaked the document soon after the Politico stunt, Roberts and the Biden administration have ceased their efforts to identify the leaker.
In truth, Roberts’ decision to launch an investigation and then do nothing was a convenient manner of allowing delays and delaying the ruling’s release to the public.
In the interim, while America waits to hear, the left is preparing to fight back against the ruling, which was prolonged this week, possibly to allow the left more time to harm the Justices and ruin the ruling.
NPR, like the majority of lapdog media, is not concerned in the leader, but rather in supporting the left’s organizing and messaging through reports such as this one:
“States across the country already have signaled their intention to restrict or ban abortion if Roe v. Wade is struck down. Some 40 million women of reproductive age live in those states, and advocates for reproductive rights say ending Roe could have seismic consequences for the country.
More on this story via The Republic Brief:
The news that the Supreme Court may be poised to strike down Roe. v. Wade spurred protests outside the court last night and abortion-rights activists are being urged to march in cities across the country later today.”
The apparent leaking of a Supreme Court draft opinion is unprecedented in modern court history, but the high court has seen some lesser leaks in the past — including in the 1972 Roe v. Wade case.
U.S. Supreme Court officials are ramping up their search for the source of the leaked draft opinion that would overturn Roe v. Wade.
And one Republican thinks he has an idea of “who” the leaker might be.
Conservative Brief, Martin Walsh, reported on one US Rep who was suspicious from the day after the leak:
“In an interview with Newsmax, Montana GOP Rep. Matt Rosendale said he was certain at least some of the justices know the leaker’s identity, saying he thinks they should come forward if they do.
“We all could probably agree that the justices that were appointed by Democrat presidents know who the leaker was,” he said. “What bothers me, it’s not only the undermining that it did of the institution and the trust factor that these folks have with each other, it’s that now that the trust is broken, it’s very difficult to restore it.” Read more…