It has come to light that Cassidy Hutchinson, the Democrat’s unexpected star witness at its show trials on January 6, had sung a different tune in text messages sent months earlier, in which she referred to the left-wing kangaroo court as a load of “BS.”

Hutchinson, a former assistant to Mark Meadows, the chief of staff for President Donald Trump in the White House in 2020, was called in for what the Democrats and their willing media operatives labeled “bombshell” testimony, however the majority of what she stated was swiftly refuted as fake news. In the end, it was more of a fizzle than a bomb, but the left treated it as major breaking news.

After Hutchinson’s testimony, cameras captured a key moment when the struggling Wyoming Rep. Liz Cheney was seen encircling Hutchinson and expressing her gratitude for her soon refuted assertions.

If questioner (Cheney) wants to appear fair to jury (American people), it probably is not a good idea to get caught on camera hugging the witness…see below from @Politico;already people have very strong feelings – both ways – about this hearing and pics like this don’t help; pic.twitter.com/lbdkMtzT4y

— Greta Van Susteren (@greta) June 29, 2022

However, it appears that Hutchinson’s perspective on the Democrats’ hearings on January 6 was very different in February, when she received a subpoena from the committee to testify before them.

Hutchinson allegedly tried to get in touch with them for assistance defending herself before the Democrat attack and even branded the Jan. 6 committee a bunch of “BS,” according to conservative activist Matt Schlapp, who is in charge of the long-running conservative convention CPAC.

On June 28, Schlapp blasted Hutchinson for “relaying WH hallway gossip as fact,” and revealed that she was seeking help ahead of her testimony.

Ms. Hutchinson approached @CPAC for help through our First Amendment Fund which has helped J6 political victims defend themselves. I am pleased we did not assist her performance today. Relaying WH hallway gossip as fact does not qualify as first person testimony. https://t.co/nfQbPshIju

— Matt Schlapp (@mschlapp) June 29, 2022

According to the Daily Caller, Hutchinson seemed keen to find some way of avoiding her appearance before the committee.

Hutchinson reportedly contacted one of Schlapp’s associates looking for a way to get the American Conservative Union or the First Amendment Fund POC to come to her aid.

“Do you happen to know a First Amendment fund POC I could reach out to? I was subpoenaed in early Nov., but the committee waited to serve me until last week (after Ben’s deposition),” Hutchinson texted the Caller reported.

“I had to accept service because the U.S. Marshalls came to my apartment last Wednesday, but I haven’t made contact with the Committee. I’m just on a tight timeline and just trying to figure out what my options are to deal with this BS,” Hutchinson continued.

More on this story via The Western Journal:

Hutchinson also said that she didn’t want the situation to get “unnecessarily elevated.”

This series of communications makes one wonder what changed between calling the hearings “BS” and hoping that it all stays under the radar to suddenly becoming an out, loud and proud Democrat “bombshell” witness. What was Hutchinson offered to make such a splash during a “surprise” scheduling? CONTINUE READING…