More
    HomeBreakingBidens DOJ Makes Concerning Announcement About Release of Durham Report

    Bidens DOJ Makes Concerning Announcement About Release of Durham Report

    Published on

    Before the Special Counsel makes his final decision on his inquiry into what we really know was a historical lie against the American people, Democrats want to silence John Durham’s voice. The Democratic demand for Durham to be shut down grows louder as the public draws closer to learning the real tale.

    In response to Durham’s findings on the extremely lengthy and drawn-out investigation, the public is calling for him to be silenced and stripped of his authority as the last authority on the topic, led by one radical far-leftist. Democrats are also working with this Democrat to prevent the whole public from learning what Durham discovered.

    In a report for Conservative Brief, Martin Walsh stated that“An Obama-era spokesman for the U.S. Department of Justice claims that Special Counsel John Durham should not have the final say in his own investigation into alleged misconduct in the FBI’s Trump-Russia investigation.”

    Attorney General Merrick Garland or another senior department official, according to Matthew Miller, who directed the department’s public affairs department from 2009 to 2011, should evaluate the study before it is made public, the Washington Examiner said.

    “His cases are over. I think it’s clear that he’s not going to bring any more charges in this investigation, but one of the requirements for special counsels under the regulations is that they write a confidential report and submit it to the attorney general, and the attorney general then makes a decision whether to release that report to the public,” Miller said.

    “I think Merrick Garland will be under a lot of pressure from Republicans to release that report, but I have to say, this circumstance is very different from the Mueller investigation, where, obviously, the attorney general, Bill Barr, did release that report,” Miller continued.

    “It’s different because in that case, the subject of that investigation could not be charged, and so it was appropriate for the department to make its findings public, so Congress could decide whether to impeach and convict the then-sitting president,” he added. “That is not the case here, so to release a report in this instance — given what we know about the way that Durham has behaved, some of his inappropriate public statements during this investigation, the poor judgments he has made in bringing these charges — to release a report publicly and let him have the final word I think probably unfairly tarnish some people at the FBI that we know he holds ill will to based on some of the things he said in this most recent trial.”

    “But it does not have to be the last word. Lots of times in the past — there’s ample precedent for this — when reports like this have been written by the Justice Department, the leadership decides whether that actually reflects their view,” Miller stated. “John Durham does not get to be the final arbiter of what the Justice Department believes, so it would be appropriate for Merrick Garland to either review it and come up with his conclusions or, maybe more appropriately, refer it to the senior career official as has been done in the past and let that individual review it and decide whether he believes the conclusions John Durham has drawn, conclusions which we know at least in two public cases have been rejected by juries, are the conclusions that the Justice Department in its considered wisdom actually agrees with and wants to let stand before the public.”

    More on this story via The Republic Brief:

    Wisconsin Republican Sen. Ron Johnson recently revealed that Durham’s investigation has “hindered Congress as lawmakers seek to root out FBI misconduct and examine the shady business dealings of Hunter Biden.”

    “Blame was cast during a recent interview on Newsmax in which Johnson vented about a dearth of successful prosecutions in Durham’s endeavor, which appears to be wrapping up as the prosecutor takes the alleged main source for a now-infamous dossier alleging ties between former President Donald Trump and Russia to court this month. The senator said he was unsatisfied, noting the lack of a conviction against lawyer Michael Sussmann, who was acquitted in May,” the Washington Examiner reported.

    “Our efforts in terms of investigating Hunter Biden, and corruption within the FBI was certainly hampered because we had an active criminal investigation under John Durham,” Johnson said. CONTINUE READING…

    Latest articles

    BREAKING: PFIZER CEO FOUND GUILTY — FACES MASSIVE PUNISHMENT

    A British pharmaceutical regulatory body found Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla guilty of making "disgracefully...

    4 Dem Senators BEG Biden After Admitting Trump Was RIGHT

    As the outdated policies of the Biden Administration show to be ineffectual for any...

    Adam Schiff’s Attempt to Play the Victim Blows Up in His Face When People See Right Through His Act

    Rep. Adam Schiff ought to be knowledgeable about lying about a man's background. The California...

    CNN Rattled by Elon Musk’s Humor, Posts Fact Check That Blows Up in Face: ‘Be Better’

    It's a common misconception that liberals lack humor. When you're so busy looking for...

    More like this

    BREAKING: PFIZER CEO FOUND GUILTY — FACES MASSIVE PUNISHMENT

    A British pharmaceutical regulatory body found Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla guilty of making "disgracefully...

    4 Dem Senators BEG Biden After Admitting Trump Was RIGHT

    As the outdated policies of the Biden Administration show to be ineffectual for any...

    Adam Schiff’s Attempt to Play the Victim Blows Up in His Face When People See Right Through His Act

    Rep. Adam Schiff ought to be knowledgeable about lying about a man's background. The California...